Compliments of marco monetti

The word “group” conjures mixed memories of stonewalling team members; the self-presumed “bossy and overbearing,” along with wall flowers who were along for the ride. Agreement may have been missing in action – an unfortunate outcome, considering that an amalgam of viewpoints creates a superior product. How can we induce alchemy when tossed with a random mix of individuals?

I. Proceed on a common platform:

    A “Team Agreement” for example includes:

  • member names
  • contact information
  • vision statement (what the team ultimately wishes to achieve past its adjournment) and mission statement (team’s purpose);
  • member strengths and weaknesses (so that assigning team roles is a more obvious task); and
  • a conflict management plan, delineating:
    • how the team defines conflict;
    • what constitutes member clash;
    • a step by step plan for addressing disagreements and relational fallout; along with
    • last ditch efforts to resolve disagreement among team members (before ratcheting the issue to a higher level).

The “gelling” process of forming, storming, norming, and performing can proceed methodically, or it can be stalled as a result of intractable discord. A master plan (a contract of sorts) that guides effort toward mutually agreed upon outcomes is a must.

Sometimes teams fail to communicate, leaving members at odds when it comes to project interaction. Tools for real time collaboration include Google’s Apache Wave, Google Drive (which includes built-in video conferencing), and PBWiki. In addition, the app GroupMe allows for “private chat rooms for small groups,” a great way to get the conversation rolling after drafting an initial agreement.

II. Mix optimism into a recipe for group magic – to produce more than individuals alone could achieve. Some firms accomplish informality through after hours get togethers (which bond members as more than a random collection of folks, one absent the job/functional/hierarchical distinctions they wear at work and/or school). Commiseration on a more equal footing, where coworkers feel comfortable “letting their hair down” results in a union of equals. Employees committed to a team: (1) emphasize the concept “we;” (2) ascertain what is best for everyone else (which may or may not jibe with individual desires); and (3) refrain from conversational bullying, which includes:

  • Hogging the conversation: a verbal equivalent of filibuster, in which one team member attempts to cement their agenda as the group’s one and only.
  • Singling people out/putting people on the spot. Allow individuals to speak/act for themselves, instead of deciding for them what they could/should say to everybody else (saving  embarrassment, humiliation, and hurt feelings for potentially wounded parties).
  • Shouting/name calling. Need we say more? It is difficult to imagine grown folk acting childishly, but examples of its occurrence at work/school abound.

Whatever the tack, treating members how they wish to be treated is a recipe for productive team pursuits, and a playbook for motivation on a grander, more group-wide scale.


Related post:

Dress for success to impress

Formal and informal presentation

Make your words sweet – you may have to eat them

The gift of gab on parchment

The professionalism series – inaugural posting

Examples of Business Team Building Activities



Share |

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

All viewpoints expressed by Jackie Gilbert are her own, and not of her employer.

Comments are moderated.
One Response
  1. […] Optimum performance through team input […]

  2. Organized for Efficiency » Blog Archive » Reclaiming time to enhance our itinerary on March 14th, 2018 at 7:31 pm